Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Final Programme:

Chairman: Theodore Christakis (University of Grenoble)

Annyssa Bellal (Irish Center for Human Rights, National University of Ireland, Galway): “Armed protest and international law”

Kenneth Chan & Jed Odermatt (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), “The ‘strategic’ recognition and de-recognition of old and new governments in the use of force: A legal analysis of issues of legality and inherent risks”

Vaïos Koutroulis (ULB) : “Quand est-ce qu’un conflit armé non international commence ? Enseignements à la lumière des révoltes de 2010-2012 en Tunisie, en Egypte, en Libye et en Syrie”

Shannonbrooke Murphy (Middlesex University): “Codifying the Right to Resist in International Law”

Charlotte Steinorth (CEU), “Resolution 1973 and the Security Council’s Instrumental Turn to Democracy”

Owen Taylor (School of Oriental and African Studies), ‘Between Reform, Revolution and a hard place: The political economy of the New International Economic Order’

Fernando R. Tesón (Florida State University): “Humanitarian Intervention as Assistance to Justified Revolutions”

Dear Members of the ESIL Interest Group on Peace and Security,

Please find hereafter some important information concerning the activities of the IGPS:

ESIL IGPS Workshop in Valencia, 13 September 2012 – Call for Papers
“Has International Law Something to Say About Revolution?”

The ESIL Interest Group on Peace and Security (IGPS) has the pleasure to announce that its third Workshop will take place in Valencia, Spain, just before the opening of the 5th ESIL Biennial Conference, on the topic: “Has International Law Something to Say About Revolution?”.

The recent revolts in the Arab world and the international reactions that followed them demonstrated, according to some commentators, the limits of International Law in dealing with revolutions. This workshop will try to test and challenge this idea. Potential topics include: Is there a right to democracy in International Law? Legitimacy, recognition and de-recognition of governments and the principle of effectiveness; The continuing relevance of the principles of non intervention/non-interference in domestic affairs; The threshold of applicability of jus in bello; The International Human Rights implications posed both by the revolutions themselves and by outside responses; The role of the UN Security Council and the problem of interpretation of its resolutions…

The Workshop panel will consist of four or five participants and a chairperson. The Languages used will be English and French.

The IGPS invites the submission of abstracts from ESIL members or other scholars or practitioners interested in participating in this special workshop.Priority will be given to IGPS members. Papers presented at the workshop will be selected through a competitive process involving the submission of abstracts. The selection process will be based exclusively on the scholarly merits of the submitted proposals. Each submission should include the following:

A) An abstract of no more than 600 words in English or French specifying the intended language for the paper; and
B) A short CV in English or French including the author’s name, institutional affiliation, contact information and e-mail address.

All applications should be submitted to the IGPS chairman Prof. Theodore Christakis (christakis@wanadoo.fr). The deadline for submission of proposals is Thursday, 1 March 2012. The outcome of the selection process will be notified to all applicants by Monday, 19 March 2012. The selection Committee will be composed only by members who do not intend to present an application. Its composition will be notified to all applicants with the results.

Strategy and publication
Please note that the strategy of the IGPS has always been to organize important events during the ESIL bi-annual Conferences. The general idea is not to transform these workshops to a kind of “à default” solution for members unable to present papers during the main ESIL Conference but, on the contrary, to organize events of high quality capable to be followed by publications in major (and peer-reviewed) journals of International Law. In October 2009 the IGPS published in the Revue Belge de droit international [(2008) 1/2, at 353–458] the Symposium on ‘Insurgency and International Law’ organized at the Max Planck Institute in Heidelberg during the September 2008 ESIL Conference. This Symposium included papers in English and in French. In February 2011 the IGPS published in the Leiden Journal of International Law (vol 24, 2011, at 71-161) the Symposium on the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo held during the ESIL Conference at the University of Cambridge. We welcome any expression of interest for the publication of this new event and we invite eventual editors to be part of the Selection Committee.

Registration to the main ESIL Conference
Interest Group attendees are under no obligation to attend the main ESIL 2012 conference. We invite nonetheless IGPS members who wish to attend the conference to register following the instructions on the conference website. Please note that there should be no waiver from registration fees for ESIL IG panelists. The ESIL Secretariat also asked us to remind all IG members to renew their membership of the society for the year 2012.

Election of a Steering Committee and future activities
The meeting in Valencia will also give us the opportunity to elect a Steering Committee in order to organize future events and activities. We could discuss ideas that you have often submitted to me during our exchange of e-mails such as:

-    organizing events and workshops more often and outside the main events of the ESIL;
-    creating “sub-groups” concerning particular areas of interest for members of the IGPS;
-    cooperating with other IGs;
-    reviving the web-site of the IGPS;

A group of Ph.D. students of the University of Grenoble has accepted to help us with the administration of the group and its website. This will also permit to create in the near future in the website a “Directory” with the names, titles, contact details and areas of expertise of all IGPS members with a link to their personal page.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any reactions or additional ideas concerning the future events and activities of the IGPS.

Sincerely yours,

Theodore CHRISTAKIS
Professor of International Law
Director of the Centre for International Security and
European Studies (CESICE), University of Grenoble
Chairman of the ESIL Interest Group on Peace and Security

A la fin du mois de mai dernier, l’administration Obama a publié un document intitulé “National Security Strategy. A la page 22, on y retrouve un intéressant encadré intitulé “Use of force”.

Sans surprise, les principes qui y sont énoncés sont nettement moins radicaux en comparaison avec la “Doctrine Bush Septembre 2002″. Cependant, les Etats-Unis se réservent le droit d’agir, “si nécessaire”, unilatéralement, tout en affirmant adhérer aux normes juridiques régissant l’usage de la force.

Consultez l’extrait ainsi que les documents complets dans la rubrique Forum.  Des commentaires éventuels sont les bienvenus.

Dans la nuit du 30 au 31 mai 2010, un commando de l’armée israélienne a pris par la force le contrôle d’une flotille internationale qui voguait à destination de Gaza dans le but officiel de contourner le blocus en y acheminant de l’aide humanitaire et civile. L’opération a fait une dizaine de morts, ainsi que de nombreux blessés. Le 1er juin, le Conseil de sécurité a condamné l’opération militaire et appelé à une enquête impartiale (SC/9940  et S/PRST/2010/9). Cet épisode pose plusieurs questions juridiques intéressantes. Pour lancer le débat, on trouvera ci-après l’argumentation juridique officielle de l’Etat d’Israël, ainsi que divers points de vue parus sur le net. Pour lire ces points de vue visitez la page  forum de ce site. Toutes les réactions et commentaires sont les bienvenues dans ce forum, pourvu que l’on reste dans le cadre d’une analyse de droit international.

Le 17 mai 2010, dans l’arrêt rendu dans l’affaire Kononov c. Lettonie, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme a considéré que la condamnation par les tribunaux lettons en 2004 d’un partisan rouge pour des crimes de guerre commis en 1944 ne constituait pas une violation du principe de la légalité des délits et des peines (art. 7 de la Conv. EDH). La Cour a trouvé dans le droit international de 1944 une base juridique suffisamment claire pour les crimes de guerre pour lesquels le requérant avait été condamné. A cette fin, elle a été amenée à analyser, notamment, une série des règles du droit international humanitaire. Suivent quelques remarques sur l’analyse entreprise par la Cour, qui semble avoir utilisé des lunettes de 2010 pour lire le DIH de 1944.

 Pour lire l’article et faire un commentaire cliquer ici 

The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo: Has International Law Something to Say About Secession?

 

The Interest Group on Peace and Security (IGPS) will be holding a workshop on The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo on Thursday 2nd September 2010, in Cambridge, just before the opening of the 4th Biennial Conference of the European Society of International Law.

 

On 17 February 2008 the provisional institutions of self-government of Kosovo proceeded to a unilateral declaration of independence. International reaction has been rather mixed. As of 19 May 2010, 69 States have formally recognized Kosovo as a new independent State, whereas the majority of UN Member States has not recognized Kosovo. On the legal ground, a dispute arose about interpretation of classical rules of international law (self-determination, territorial integrity, recognition, non-interference in domestic affairs, definition of a State) and of relevant norms adopted within the framework of the international administration of Kosovo put in place by the Security Council in 1999 (SC Res 1244 (1999)). On 8 October 2008, the General Assembly requested an Advisory Opinion from the Court on the “Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo”. The Court is now deliberating and will deliver its Advisory Opinion in the next few months.

  

This workshop of the IGPS will provide an opportunity to comment on this important opinion. Participants will be invited to discuss the impact of this Opinion and of this case to International Law and the relevance of contemporary international legal rules in dealing with secession. Participants to this workshop include many academics working in the fields of self-determination/international administration of territories:

Dr. Theodore Christakis, Professor, University of Grenoble
Dr. Olivier Corten, Professor, Free University of Brussels
Dr. Marcelo Kohen, Professor, Graduate Institute of International Studies
Dr. Anne Peters, Professor, University of Basel
Dr. Marc Weller, Reader, University of Cambridge
Dr. Ralph Wilde, Reader, University College London

 

For further information, to register your interest in the event, or to join the IGPS please visit the IGPS website (http://igps.wordpress.com/) or contact Professor Theodore Christakis (Christakis@wanadoo.fr).

In his response to the contribution by Professor Theodore CHRISTAKIS on “The Colombia Cross-border Raid…”, Professor Rafael PRIETO SANJUAN, of the University Javeriana, Bogotá, argues that, although this incident demonstrated once again the effectiveness of regional dispute settlement mechanisms, it also perhaps revealed an ultra conservative commitment to sovereignty by the OAS which could be damaging to the fight against terrorism.

To read the whole article and comment visit the forum page.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.